What Is an Accidental Death? A Dive into AD&D Insurance and Legal Standards

Whatever brought you here, I hope we can make a difference.

Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) insurance can provide crucial financial support in the wake of an unexpected tragedy. At Dorian Law, we stand up for people nationwide who are navigating complex accidental death and dismemberment insurance claims. But what exactly qualifies as an “accidental death” in these policies? It’s a surprisingly nuanced question—one that can make or break a claim.

This guide explores what counts as an “accidental death,” how exclusions and state law interpretations shape claims, and what you can do if your accidental death claim is denied. Along the way, we’ll share real-world examples and legal insights to help you better understand your rights.

What Counts as an Accidental Death?

Most AD&D insurance policies define an “accidental death” as a fatality that happens directly and solely from an accident—like car crashes, slips and falls, or drownings. In legal terms, these deaths are usually considered sudden, external, and unintended.

If the insured didn’t expect or intend the fatal outcome, it generally meets this broad definition. However, insurance companies might argue that risky behavior makes a death foreseeable, or that exclusions in the policy bar recovery. That’s why a thorough understanding of what counts as an accidental death—and how to prove an accidental death claim—is crucial.

AD&D policies don’t just cover fatalities, either. They also pay benefits for serious injuries (dismemberment), like the loss of a limb or sense (sight, hearing, speech). This broader protection is a key difference from standard life insurance.

Common Exclusions in AD&D Policies

Even when a death seems sudden and tragic, insurance companies often rely on policy exclusions to deny accidental death claims. Common exclusions include:

• Natural causes, illnesses, or disease
  Deaths from heart attacks, strokes, or other medical conditions typically aren’t covered.

• Suicide or self-harm
  Policies almost always exclude deaths that were intentional.

• Intoxication or drug use
  Deaths linked to alcohol or non-prescribed drugs—even if unintentional—can be excluded.

• High-risk activities and extreme sports
  Activities like skydiving, racing, or mountaineering may not be covered.

• Criminal acts or acts of war
  Fatalities in these contexts are typically excluded.

Because of these exclusions, proving an accidental death insurance claim requires close reading of the policy and often a fight with the insurer.

Understanding AD&D Insurance: Key Features and Benefits

Accidental Death and Dismemberment insurance usually supplements a life or health insurance policy. It’s designed to provide financial protection for a specific cause: accidental injuries or deaths.

Key features include:

• Lump-sum payments to beneficiaries in accidental death cases.

• Partial payouts for dismemberment, often based on injury severity.

• More affordable premiums than standard life insurance because accidental deaths happen less frequently.

• Targeted protection for individuals in higher-risk jobs or situations.

Because of its narrower coverage, AD&D insurance should be viewed as an extra layer of protection—not a full substitute for life insurance.

ERISA’s Role in Accidental Death Claims

Many accidental death and dismemberment insurance claims arise from employer-sponsored benefit plans. These plans are typically governed by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

Under ERISA:

• Claimants must first complete a mandatory appeal process before suing.

• ERISA doesn’t define “accidental death”—courts rely on policy language and federal common law.

• Courts use a two-part test to decide if a death was accidental, weighing the insured’s expectations and those of a reasonable person.

This legal framework makes accidental death and dismemberment insurance claims more complex than standard life insurance disputes.

The Prevailing Legal Test: Subjective and Objective Standards

The Wickman test is the standard most federal courts use in ERISA accidental death claims:

1️⃣ Subjective belief: Did the insured expect to die or be seriously injured? If so (like in suicide), it’s not accidental.
2️⃣ Objective reasonableness: If the insured’s own expectations can’t be determined, would a reasonable person have seen death or injury as highly likely in those circumstances?

This two-part analysis helps courts decide what truly qualifies as an accidental death under ERISA.

Dissenting Opinions and Alternative Views

Not every court agrees on the Wickman test. Some alternative approaches include:

• Presumption against suicide (like in Horton v. Reliance Standard), favoring beneficiaries if the insured’s intent is unclear.

• The older debate about “accidental means” versus “accidental results,” still relevant in some state law insurance interpretations.

• The Ninth Circuit’s “substantially certain” standard (e.g., Padfield v. AIG Life Insurance), which can be more favorable to claimants than the “highly likely” standard.

These variations can shape how courts handle a claim—and why your jurisdiction matters.

How States Interpret “Accidental Death”: A Nationwide Look

For individual accidental death insurance policies, state law applies. There’s no single nationwide definition of “accidental death,” so courts rely on state statutes and case law.

• Most states use the ordinary meaning of “accident”—something sudden, external, and unintended.

• In Louisiana, insurers must prove illness or natural causes if both factors are at play.

• Washington uses a medical examiner definition: an “unnatural death.”

• Kentucky emphasizes the insured’s reasonable expectations.

• Many states resolve ambiguities in favor of beneficiaries.

Because of these differences, state law interpretations of accidental death insurance can be a deciding factor in your claim.

Illustrative Court Cases: Real-World Examples

Real cases show how these legal standards play out:

• Wickman v. Northwestern National – A man fell from a bridge after climbing over a guardrail. The court ruled death was highly likely, denying benefits.

• Goldfarb v. Reliance Standard – An experienced climber died in Pakistan. The court agreed death was highly likely, upholding the insurer’s denial.

• West v. Aetna Life – Despite intoxication, the policy didn’t exclude alcohol-related deaths, so the court found it was accidental.

• Basketball injury case – A pulmonary embolism followed a basketball injury, and the court found the accidental injury triggered the death.

These cases highlight the real-world complexities of accidental death insurance claims.

Navigating the Complexities of Accidental Death Claims

Defining and proving an accidental death insurance claim isn’t always straightforward. Exclusions, ERISA or state law standards, and different legal tests can all come into play.

At Dorian Law, we help clients nationwide fight for their rights when accidental death and dismemberment insurance claims are denied. If you’re facing a denial—or just have questions about your AD&D insurance coverage—contact us for a consultation. We’re here to help you understand your options and stand up to insurance companies that try to avoid paying what’s fair.